Okinawan vs Pima Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Okinawan
Pima
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Okinawans
Pima
27.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
13.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Okinawan vs Pima Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,692,255 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108 and weighted average of 27.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,534,200 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243 and weighted average of 27.1%, a difference of 0.25%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Okinawan | Pima |
Minimum | 7.6% | 13.8% |
Maximum | 46.3% | 50.0% |
Range | 38.7% | 36.2% |
Mean | 27.2% | 29.2% |
Median | 26.9% | 27.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.9% | 21.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.2% | 35.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Okinawans and Pima by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Dominica (27.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Welsh (27.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (27.2%, a difference of 0.030%), African (27.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Northern European (27.2%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Paraguayan (27.1%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), German (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (27.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Japan (27.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Poland | 16.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 27.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 15.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 27.2% |
Welsh | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 27.2% |
Okinawans | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 27.2% |
Africans | 13.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 27.2% |
Northern Europeans | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 27.2% |
Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |