Marshallese vs Shoshone Family Households
COMPARE
Marshallese
Shoshone
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Marshallese
Shoshone
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
6.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
9.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Shoshone Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,761,315 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 63.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,615,877 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 63.8%, a difference of 0.11%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Marshallese | Shoshone |
Minimum | 57.4% | 43.8% |
Maximum | 82.4% | 88.1% |
Range | 25.0% | 44.3% |
Mean | 68.8% | 67.0% |
Median | 66.2% | 65.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.9% | 60.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.4% | 73.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Shoshone by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Europe (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Netherlands (63.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Thailand (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |