Luxembourger vs Slovak Family Households
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Slovak
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Luxembourgers
Slovaks
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Slovak Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,654,456 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 63.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,683,029 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 63.3%, a difference of 0.050%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Slovak |
| Minimum | 41.4% | 21.3% |
| Maximum | 93.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 51.9% | 78.7% |
| Mean | 67.9% | 62.9% |
| Median | 67.5% | 63.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.2% | 59.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.7% | 66.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Slovaks by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Potawatomi (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (63.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and Taiwanese (63.3%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Potawatomi (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (63.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Icelander (63.3%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Icelanders | 0.8 /100 | #257 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.7 /100 | #258 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Cypriots | 0.6 /100 | #260 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.5 /100 | #263 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Kenyans | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Colville | 0.5 /100 | #265 | Tragic 63.2% |