Laotian vs Alaskan Athabascan Average Family Size
COMPARE
Laotian
Alaskan Athabascan
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Laotians
Alaskan Athabascans
3.26
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
88.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.27
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Alaskan Athabascan Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,743,344 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091 and weighted average of 3.26. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,814,644 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 3.27, a difference of 0.21%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 1.94 | 1.83 |
Maximum | 4.70 | 6.79 |
Range | 2.76 | 4.96 |
Mean | 3.18 | 3.34 |
Median | 3.20 | 3.21 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.00 | 2.95 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.32 | 3.50 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.32 | 0.55 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.52 | 0.82 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.51 | 0.82 |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Alaskan Athabascans by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Hong Kong (3.26, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Asia (3.26, a difference of 0.030%), Colombian (3.26, a difference of 0.060%), Costa Rican (3.26, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (3.26, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Colombia (3.27, a difference of 0.020%), South American Indian (3.26, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (3.27, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cuba (3.26, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (3.27, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Kiowa | 94.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Immigrants | Asia | 94.0 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 93.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Immigrants | Thailand | 93.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Immigrants | Colombia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Alaskan Athabascans | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 3.27 |
South American Indians | 91.6 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 3.26 |
Immigrants | Cuba | 91.3 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 3.26 |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.7 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 3.26 |
Immigrants | Syria | 90.6 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 3.26 |
Colombians | 89.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 3.26 |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 88.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 3.26 |
Laotians | 88.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 3.26 |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 87.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 3.26 |
Costa Ricans | 86.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 3.26 |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 86.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 3.26 |
Africans | 84.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 3.25 |
Panamanians | 84.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 3.25 |
Comanche | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 3.25 |