Jordanian vs Mongolian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Jordanian
Mongolian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Jordanians
Mongolians
29.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
70.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Mongolian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,374,879 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.668 and weighted average of 29.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,279,389 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.232 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 5.0%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Mongolian |
Minimum | 16.3% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 42.6% |
Range | 58.7% | 38.6% |
Mean | 32.2% | 26.7% |
Median | 30.6% | 27.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.3% | 23.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.9% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 7.5% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Apache (29.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants (28.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Peruvian (29.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Philippines (29.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Peru (28.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Spanish American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 29.1% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 29.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 29.0% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 29.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 29.0% |
Peruvians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 29.0% |
Apache | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 29.0% |
Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 29.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 28.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 28.9% |
Guatemalans | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 28.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 28.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 28.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 28.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 28.8% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |