Jordanian vs Laotian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Jordanian
Laotian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Jordanians
Laotians
48.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
48.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Laotian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,389,697 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 48.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,741,438 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 48.4%, a difference of 0.070%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Laotian |
Minimum | 23.6% | 25.2% |
Maximum | 83.7% | 92.4% |
Range | 60.1% | 67.2% |
Mean | 51.6% | 56.0% |
Median | 50.9% | 53.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.2% | 47.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.8% | 64.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Laotians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Romanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from China (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Northern European (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from North America (48.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (48.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from China (48.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Romanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Croatians | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bulgarians | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Basques | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Jordanians | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Romanians | 98.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 98.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | China | 98.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | North America | 98.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Laotians | 98.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 98.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.6 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Immigrants | England | 98.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 48.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 98.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 48.2% |
Canadians | 98.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 48.2% |
Egyptians | 98.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 48.2% |