Iroquois vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Currently Married
COMPARE
Iroquois
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Iroquois
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
44.7%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
44.3%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,297,556 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254 and weighted average of 44.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,355,169 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 44.3%, a difference of 0.95%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
| Minimum | 14.1% | 28.3% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 67.5% |
| Range | 52.6% | 39.2% |
| Mean | 44.5% | 45.3% |
| Median | 46.1% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.7% | 40.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.2% | 48.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (44.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Nepalese (44.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Alaskan Athabascan (44.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Cuban (44.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Seminole (44.6%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Armenia (44.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Ugandan (44.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Nicaraguan (44.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Cameroon (44.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (44.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 1.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 44.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 44.9% |
| Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 44.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 44.7% |
| Iroquois | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 44.7% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Cubans | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Seminole | 0.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Moroccans | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Ethiopians | 0.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Japanese | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.4 /100 | #245 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Ugandans | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 44.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 44.2% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 44.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 44.2% |