Inupiat vs Immigrants Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Inupiat
Immigrants
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Inupiat
Immigrants
42.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
43.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Immigrants Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,320,700 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395 and weighted average of 42.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,047,094 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 46.3%, a difference of 9.3%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Immigrants |
| Minimum | 12.1% | 18.2% |
| Maximum | 81.8% | 80.0% |
| Range | 69.7% | 61.8% |
| Mean | 42.6% | 46.7% |
| Median | 43.0% | 47.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.1% | 45.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.0% | 48.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 6.1% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Bermudan (42.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Ghanaian (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Costa Rica (46.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (46.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Cajun (46.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Mongolian (46.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Malaysian (46.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| South Americans | 58.0 /100 | #170 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 55.7 /100 | #171 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 54.6 /100 | #172 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 52.0 /100 | #173 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 46.1 /100 | #175 | Average 46.4% |
| Cajuns | 45.2 /100 | #176 | Average 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 43.8 /100 | #177 | Average 46.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 43.4 /100 | #178 | Average 46.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 43.0 /100 | #179 | Average 46.3% |
| Mongolians | 42.0 /100 | #180 | Average 46.3% |
| Malaysians | 41.8 /100 | #181 | Average 46.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 38.9 /100 | #182 | Fair 46.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 38.3 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.2% |