Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Comanche Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Comanche
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Comanche
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Comanche Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,791,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 63.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,767,909 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713 and weighted average of 63.5%, a difference of 0.010%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Comanche |
| Minimum | 31.0% | 47.4% |
| Maximum | 89.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 57.9% | 52.6% |
| Mean | 66.3% | 69.1% |
| Median | 65.4% | 66.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.0% | 63.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.0% | 73.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Comanche by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Ghanaian (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (63.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Ghanaian (63.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Albanian (63.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Finnish (63.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |