Immigrants from South Africa vs Norwegian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Norwegian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Norwegians
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
5.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
13.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Norwegian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,270,946 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 63.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,913,401 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386 and weighted average of 63.9%, a difference of 0.30%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 23.8% | 33.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 76.2% | 66.7% |
| Mean | 66.2% | 66.0% |
| Median | 64.6% | 64.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.5% | 61.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.3% | 68.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.8% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.1% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.9% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Norwegians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Europe (63.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belarus (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Iranian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |