Immigrants from Netherlands vs Lithuanian Births to Unmarried Women

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,807,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.676 and weighted average of 29.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 385,212,926 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506 and weighted average of 29.6%, a difference of 1.3%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Netherlands	Lithuanian
Minimum	10.7%	7.7%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	89.3%	92.3%
Mean	48.1%	37.3%
Median	33.1%	31.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	25.2%	24.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	79.5%	40.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	54.3%	15.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	33.1%	23.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	32.4%	22.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Netherlands and Lithuanians by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Netherlands are Immigrants from Norway (29.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Argentinean (30.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Italy (29.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Ethiopian (29.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Croatia (29.8%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Lebanese (29.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (29.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Australian (29.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (29.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Swedish (29.6%, a difference of 0.30%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Luxembourgers	95.2 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 29.4%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	94.7 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 29.5%
Australians	94.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 29.5%
Lebanese	94.4 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 29.5%
Lithuanians	94.4 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 29.6%
Immigrants \| Nepal	94.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 29.6%
Swedes	93.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 29.6%
Immigrants \| Brazil	93.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 29.6%
Paraguayans	93.5 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 29.7%
Greeks	93.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 29.7%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	93.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 29.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	93.0 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 29.7%
Basques	93.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 29.7%
Scandinavians	92.7 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 29.8%
Immigrants \| Croatia	92.6 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 29.8%
Ethiopians	91.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 29.8%
Immigrants \| Italy	91.7 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 29.9%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	91.1 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 29.9%
Immigrants \| Norway	91.0 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 29.9%
Argentineans	90.5 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 30.0%
Ugandans	89.2 /100 \| #120	Excellent 30.1%