Immigrants from Nepal vs Latvian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Latvian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Latvians
62.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Latvian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,706,837 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 62.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,652,081 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 62.8%, a difference of 0.11%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Latvian |
Minimum | 47.6% | 31.0% |
Maximum | 83.7% | 92.3% |
Range | 36.1% | 61.3% |
Mean | 63.7% | 65.1% |
Median | 63.3% | 65.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.7% | 60.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.7% | 70.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal and Latvians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Immigrants from Grenada (62.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Uganda (62.7%, a difference of 0.090%), British West Indian (62.8%, a difference of 0.11%), U.S. Virgin Islander (62.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Mongolian (62.8%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are British West Indian (62.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (62.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Mongolian (62.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (62.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Denmark (62.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 63.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |
New Zealanders | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 62.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 62.9% |
Australians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 62.8% |
Mongolians | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 62.8% |
British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 62.8% |
Latvians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 62.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 62.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 62.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 62.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 62.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 62.6% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 62.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 62.5% |
Okinawans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 62.5% |
Slovenes | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 62.4% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 62.4% |