Immigrants from Lithuania vs Nigerian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Nigerian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Nigerians
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
11.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Nigerian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,713,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 63.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,466,874 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 63.9%, a difference of 0.020%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Nigerian |
Minimum | 55.9% | 41.2% |
Maximum | 80.4% | 85.2% |
Range | 24.4% | 44.1% |
Mean | 66.0% | 67.1% |
Median | 65.2% | 66.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.3% | 62.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.6% | 71.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Nigerians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Norwegian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Sierra Leonean (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Sierra Leonean (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Iranian (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |