Immigrants from Israel vs Potawatomi Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Potawatomi
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Potawatomi
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Potawatomi Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,979,754 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529 and weighted average of 63.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,759,902 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 63.3%, a difference of 0.22%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 33.2% | 37.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 66.8% | 62.9% |
Mean | 69.4% | 66.1% |
Median | 65.6% | 65.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 61.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.4% | 70.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Potawatomi by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Slovak (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Luxembourger (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Icelander (63.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |
Icelanders | 0.8 /100 | #257 | Tragic 63.3% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.7 /100 | #258 | Tragic 63.2% |