Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tsimshian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Tsimshian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Tsimshian
66.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
67.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Tsimshian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,896,995 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155 and weighted average of 66.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.741 and weighted average of 67.1%, a difference of 1.4%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 40.7% | 58.0% |
| Maximum | 93.8% | 80.1% |
| Range | 53.1% | 22.1% |
| Mean | 70.3% | 67.7% |
| Median | 70.5% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.1% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 73.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Tsimshian by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Colombia (66.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Colombian (66.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Afghan (66.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Native/Alaskan (66.4%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Peruvian (67.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (67.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (67.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (66.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (66.6%, a difference of 0.74%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Peruvians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Mexican American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 67.0% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 67.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 66.6% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 66.6% |
| Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Apache | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |