Immigrants from Guatemala vs Choctaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Choctaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Choctaw
65.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Choctaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,174,620 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 65.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,627,638 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 0.27%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Choctaw |
Minimum | 35.3% | 43.9% |
Maximum | 91.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 56.4% | 56.1% |
Mean | 66.6% | 66.7% |
Median | 67.1% | 65.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.8% | 62.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.1% | 68.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala and Choctaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Scandinavian (65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), European (65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (65.1%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (65.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Alaska Native (65.1%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belize (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Oceania (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |