Immigrants from Central America vs Sudanese Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Central America
Sudanese
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Central America
Sudanese
37.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
27.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Central America vs Sudanese Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,080,403 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 37.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,881,308 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 32.4%, a difference of 15.5%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Central America | Sudanese |
Minimum | 9.7% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 64.6% |
Range | 90.3% | 62.4% |
Mean | 42.8% | 33.6% |
Median | 40.7% | 31.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.4% | 26.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.2% | 42.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.0% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.0% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Spanish American Indian (37.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Mexico (37.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Guatemala (37.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Liberian (37.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Belize (37.3%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 37.1% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 37.1% |
West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #279 | Tragic 37.3% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 37.3% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 37.3% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 37.4% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 37.5% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 37.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 37.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 37.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 37.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 37.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 37.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Fijian (32.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Colombian (32.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Irish (32.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Tlingit-Haida (32.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and Samoan (32.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Czechoslovakians | 38.0 /100 | #187 | Fair 32.0% |
Osage | 37.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 32.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 36.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 32.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 32.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 32.2% |
Irish | 32.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 32.2% |
Colombians | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 32.2% |
Fijians | 31.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 32.3% |
Sudanese | 27.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 32.4% |
Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |