Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Central American Indian Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,235,396 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,008,789 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.332 and weighted average of 27.9%, a difference of 0.31%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar	Central American Indian
Minimum	12.1%	9.0%
Maximum	44.7%	56.2%
Range	32.6%	47.2%
Mean	29.5%	27.1%
Median	28.3%	28.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.9%	20.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	33.1%	31.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	10.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.7%	9.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.6%	8.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Central American Indians by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Tohono O'odham (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Malaysia (27.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Pakistani (27.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Zimbabwean (27.9%, a difference of 0.040%), European (27.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 27.8%