Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Alaskan Athabascan Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,805,510 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091 and weighted average of 44.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,814,810 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.621 and weighted average of 43.6%, a difference of 1.8%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Alaskan Athabascan
Minimum	29.9%	7.7%
Maximum	64.0%	85.7%
Range	34.1%	78.0%
Mean	44.3%	37.3%
Median	44.0%	39.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	38.2%	26.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	48.8%	48.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.6%	21.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.9%	15.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.8%	15.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Alaskan Athabascans by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Albania (44.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (44.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Armenia (44.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from El Salvador (44.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Cuba (44.2%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Iroquois (43.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.45%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	1.0 /100 \| #241	Tragic 44.4%
Immigrants \| Albania	1.0 /100 \| #242	Tragic 44.4%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	0.9 /100 \| #243	Tragic 44.4%
Immigrants \| Armenia	0.7 /100 \| #244	Tragic 44.3%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.7 /100 \| #245	Tragic 44.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.6 /100 \| #246	Tragic 44.2%
Immigrants \| Morocco	0.6 /100 \| #247	Tragic 44.2%
Yup'ik	0.4 /100 \| #248	Tragic 44.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	0.4 /100 \| #249	Tragic 44.1%
French American Indians	0.4 /100 \| #250	Tragic 44.1%
German Russians	0.4 /100 \| #251	Tragic 44.0%
Seminole	0.4 /100 \| #252	Tragic 44.0%
Central Americans	0.3 /100 \| #253	Tragic 43.9%
Apache	0.3 /100 \| #254	Tragic 43.9%
Shoshone	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 43.9%
Ugandans	0.3 /100 \| #256	Tragic 43.8%
Blackfeet	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 43.8%
Central American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 43.8%
Iroquois	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 43.7%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 43.7%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 43.6%