Immigrants from Bahamas vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,610,461 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 41.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,710,717 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 40.9%, a difference of 2.0%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bahamas	Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Minimum	21.9%	24.5%
Maximum	65.9%	92.8%
Range	44.1%	68.3%
Mean	41.0%	44.6%
Median	39.8%	43.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	35.6%	34.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	45.1%	48.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.6%	13.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.6%	14.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.5%	14.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas and Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from Honduras (41.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Subsaharan African (41.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Ghana (41.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Guyana (41.6%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Jamaican (40.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Haiti (40.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Caribbean (40.8%, a difference of 0.18%), African (40.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Colville (41.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Ghana	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Belize	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 41.7%
Immigrants \| Honduras	0.0 /100 \| #302	Tragic 41.6%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #303	Tragic 41.6%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.0 /100 \| #304	Tragic 41.6%
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #305	Tragic 41.5%
Guyanese	0.0 /100 \| #306	Tragic 41.4%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.0 /100 \| #307	Tragic 41.4%
Crow	0.0 /100 \| #308	Tragic 41.4%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #309	Tragic 41.2%
Haitians	0.0 /100 \| #310	Tragic 41.2%
Colville	0.0 /100 \| #311	Tragic 41.0%
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #312	Tragic 40.9%
Immigrants \| Haiti	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic 40.9%
Jamaicans	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 40.9%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 40.9%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 40.8%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 40.7%
Liberians	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 40.7%