Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Navajo Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Navajo
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Navajo
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Navajo Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,637,809 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,752,458 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192 and weighted average of 66.4%, a difference of 0.76%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Navajo |
| Minimum | 42.3% | 28.6% |
| Maximum | 85.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 43.4% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 65.1% | 69.7% |
| Median | 66.8% | 69.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 64.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.4% | 75.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan and Navajo by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Native/Alaskan (66.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Colombian (66.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Afghan (66.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Colombia (66.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants (66.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |