Hmong vs Immigrants from Italy Family Households
COMPARE
Hmong
Immigrants from Italy
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Hmong
Immigrants from Italy
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Immigrants from Italy Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,604,422 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 64.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,146,705 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 0.14%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hmong | Immigrants from Italy |
Minimum | 42.8% | 43.1% |
Maximum | 82.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 39.5% | 56.9% |
Mean | 64.2% | 67.9% |
Median | 63.3% | 68.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.4% | 63.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.3% | 74.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong and Immigrants from Italy by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belize (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Oceania (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Nonimmigrants (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Cajun (64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ecuador (64.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Panama (64.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |