Ghanaian vs Finnish Family Households
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Finnish
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Ghanaians
Finns
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Finnish Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,523,422 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 63.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,508,203 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 63.5%, a difference of 0.040%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ghanaian | Finnish |
| Minimum | 50.2% | 21.6% |
| Maximum | 95.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 45.4% | 78.4% |
| Mean | 68.3% | 62.3% |
| Median | 67.1% | 62.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.3% | 55.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.1% | 67.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians and Finns by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Albanian (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Immigrants from Armenia (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (63.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |