Fijian vs Puget Sound Salish Family Households
COMPARE
Fijian
Puget Sound Salish
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Fijians
Puget Sound Salish
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Fijian vs Puget Sound Salish Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,947,966 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.673 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,155,865 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.47%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Fijian | Puget Sound Salish |
Minimum | 8.8% | 52.5% |
Maximum | 91.4% | 85.1% |
Range | 82.6% | 32.6% |
Mean | 67.3% | 66.0% |
Median | 67.6% | 65.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.7% | 61.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.0% | 70.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.4% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Fijians and Puget Sound Salish by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South America (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Yaqui (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Jordanian (65.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |