Crow vs Immigrants from Poland Family Households
COMPARE
Crow
Immigrants from Poland
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Crow
Immigrants from Poland
65.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Immigrants from Poland Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,202,817 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.428 and weighted average of 65.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,786,496 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.485 and weighted average of 65.2%, a difference of 0.060%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow | Immigrants from Poland |
Minimum | 42.9% | 25.9% |
Maximum | 87.9% | 77.7% |
Range | 45.0% | 51.8% |
Mean | 69.3% | 65.6% |
Median | 69.0% | 67.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 63.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.2% | 70.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.4% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Crow and Immigrants from Poland by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Hopi (65.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Laos (65.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Guyanese (65.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Caribbean (65.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Haiti (65.3%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Hopi (65.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (65.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Portugal (65.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Swiss (65.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Guatemalan (65.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 99.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 99.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Crow | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Hopi | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Guyanese | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Central American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Haitians | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |