Costa Rican vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Households
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from South Central Asia
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,469,677 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,677,474 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 66.4%, a difference of 0.73%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Minimum | 41.4% | 37.9% |
Maximum | 89.7% | 97.0% |
Range | 48.2% | 59.0% |
Mean | 68.7% | 70.8% |
Median | 68.7% | 69.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.6% | 65.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.6% | 75.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from South Central Asia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Central American (66.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Immigrants from Venezuela (66.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Bolivian (66.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Navajo (66.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Native/Alaskan (66.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Colombian (66.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |