Comanche vs Subsaharan African Average Family Size
COMPARE
Comanche
Subsaharan African
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Comanche
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.25
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
82.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.25
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
81.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Subsaharan African Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,768,094 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.646 and weighted average of 3.25. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,346 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174 and weighted average of 3.25, a difference of 0.040%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 2.33 | 1.39 |
| Maximum | 5.00 | 4.61 |
| Range | 2.67 | 3.22 |
| Mean | 3.39 | 3.30 |
| Median | 3.27 | 3.29 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.14 | 3.21 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.44 | 3.44 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.30 | 0.23 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.56 | 0.54 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.55 | 0.54 |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Sub-Saharan Africans by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from Middle Africa (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Cuban (3.25, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (3.25, a difference of 0.040%), Venezuelan (3.25, a difference of 0.040%), and Panamanian (3.25, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (3.25, a difference of 0.0%), Venezuelan (3.25, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Liberian (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (3.25, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Colombians | 89.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 88.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Laotians | 88.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 87.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Costa Ricans | 86.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 86.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Africans | 84.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Panamanians | 84.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Comanche | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 82.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Cubans | 81.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 81.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 81.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Venezuelans | 81.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Liberians | 81.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Bhutanese | 81.0 /100 | #143 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Tsimshian | 80.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Armenians | 78.2 /100 | #145 | Good 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Africa | 77.9 /100 | #146 | Good 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 75.7 /100 | #147 | Good 3.24 |
| Blackfeet | 75.0 /100 | #148 | Good 3.24 |