Comanche vs South African Family Households
COMPARE
Comanche
South African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Comanche
South Africans
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs South African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,767,909 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713 and weighted average of 63.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,542,946 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 63.4%, a difference of 0.030%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | South African |
| Minimum | 47.4% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 96.0% |
| Range | 52.6% | 56.0% |
| Mean | 69.1% | 68.7% |
| Median | 66.7% | 65.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.2% | 61.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.4% | 81.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 19.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and South Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Ghanaian (63.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (63.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Finnish (63.5%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |