Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Family Households
COMPARE
Chippewa
Tlingit-Haida
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chippewa
Tlingit-Haida
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Tlingit-Haida Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,001,181 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 62.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,855,548 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 61.6%, a difference of 0.77%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Tlingit-Haida |
| Minimum | 25.0% | 41.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 80.0% |
| Range | 75.0% | 38.8% |
| Mean | 65.2% | 62.4% |
| Median | 63.9% | 63.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.0% | 57.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.6% | 68.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Tlingit-Haida by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), African (62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland (61.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Ugandan (61.7%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |