Chinese vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
30.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
85.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,513,648 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522 and weighted average of 30.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,747,044 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 30.3%, a difference of 0.30%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 5.5% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 94.5% | 95.7% |
Mean | 41.4% | 38.3% |
Median | 33.7% | 28.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.5% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.5% | 43.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.0% | 24.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.6% | 26.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.4% | 26.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are European (30.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Vietnamese (30.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Croatian (30.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Icelander (30.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Syrian (30.2%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (30.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (30.3%, a difference of 0.020%), New Zealander (30.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Icelander (30.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Morocco (30.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Argentineans | 90.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 30.0% |
Ugandans | 89.2 /100 | #120 | Excellent 30.1% |
Koreans | 88.9 /100 | #121 | Excellent 30.1% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 30.1% |
Syrians | 88.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 30.2% |
Croatians | 88.0 /100 | #124 | Excellent 30.2% |
Vietnamese | 87.7 /100 | #125 | Excellent 30.2% |
Europeans | 87.2 /100 | #126 | Excellent 30.2% |
Chinese | 87.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 30.2% |
Icelanders | 86.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 85.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 85.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 30.3% |
New Zealanders | 85.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 30.4% |
Brazilians | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.9 /100 | #137 | Excellent 30.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 83.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 30.4% |