Cajun vs Immigrants from Chile Family Households
COMPARE
Cajun
Immigrants from Chile
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Cajuns
Immigrants from Chile
64.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
76.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Immigrants from Chile Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,695,707 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 64.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,601,267 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.617 and weighted average of 64.6%, a difference of 0.32%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun | Immigrants from Chile |
| Minimum | 47.6% | 33.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 77.8% |
| Range | 52.4% | 44.5% |
| Mean | 67.3% | 65.2% |
| Median | 67.2% | 66.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.6% | 62.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.7% | 69.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Immigrants from Chile by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Nonimmigrants (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Italy (64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Greek (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Welsh (64.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Czechoslovakian (64.6%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
| South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
| Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
| Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |