British vs South American Indian Family Households
COMPARE
British
South American Indian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
British
South American Indians
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs South American Indian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,009,478 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 64.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,449 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.394 and weighted average of 64.6%, a difference of 0.35%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 16.4% | 42.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 88.8% |
| Range | 83.6% | 45.9% |
| Mean | 66.4% | 69.0% |
| Median | 67.4% | 70.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.6% | 64.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.3% | 75.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.8% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to British and South American Indians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to British are Chickasaw (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Moldova (64.4%, a difference of 0.050%), German (64.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Canadian (64.4%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Czechoslovakian (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Welsh (64.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (64.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Chile (64.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
| South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
| Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
| Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
| Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
| Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
| Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
| Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
| Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
| Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |