Blackfeet vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Blackfeet
Alaskan Athabascans
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
54.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,442,274 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 27.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,814,006 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.30%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Blackfeet | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 8.0% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 69.5% | 60.0% |
Range | 61.5% | 56.7% |
Mean | 28.6% | 25.9% |
Median | 25.4% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.7% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.1% | 31.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 11.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Israeli (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Cherokee (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Argentina (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Seminole (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and White/Caucasian (27.4%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |