Bermudan vs Australian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Bermudan
Australian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Bermudans
Australians
42.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
47.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Australian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,716,155 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349 and weighted average of 42.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,029,086 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 47.4%, a difference of 11.6%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bermudan | Australian |
| Minimum | 27.0% | 24.0% |
| Maximum | 84.2% | 71.2% |
| Range | 57.1% | 47.2% |
| Mean | 48.5% | 51.3% |
| Median | 46.9% | 50.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.6% | 46.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.0% | 59.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 9.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Inupiat (42.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.46%), Ghanaian (42.2%, a difference of 0.49%), Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.1% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Zimbabwean (47.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Venezuela (47.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Pakistani (47.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Celtic (47.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Peru (47.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Germany | 92.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 47.5% |
| Chileans | 92.2 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 47.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 47.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 47.4% |
| Okinawans | 90.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 47.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.3 /100 | #123 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.2 /100 | #124 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Australians | 89.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Pakistanis | 88.6 /100 | #126 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Celtics | 88.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 87.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 87.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 87.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 47.3% |