Immigrants from Serbia vs Bhutanese Associate's Degree

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,744,029 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and percentage of population with at least associate's degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 51.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,542,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with at least associate's degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164 and weighted average of 51.4%, a difference of 0.61%.

Associate's Degree Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Serbia	Bhutanese
Minimum	13.2%	19.7%
Maximum	78.6%	71.8%
Range	65.4%	52.1%
Mean	49.8%	48.7%
Median	51.9%	48.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	46.1%	40.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	57.9%	57.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.8%	16.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.3%	12.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.2%	12.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia and Bhutanese by Associate's Degree

In terms of associate's degree, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are New Zealander (51.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Paraguayan (51.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (51.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Australian (51.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Spain (51.9%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (51.4%, a difference of 0.0%), South African (51.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Netherlands (51.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bolivia (51.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Zimbabwean (51.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Associate's Degree
Asians	99.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 52.1%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 52.1%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 52.0%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.8 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 52.0%
Immigrants \| Spain	99.8 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 51.9%
Australians	99.8 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 51.9%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.8 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 51.9%
Paraguayans	99.8 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 51.8%
New Zealanders	99.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 51.8%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 51.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.7 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 51.5%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	99.7 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 51.4%
Bhutanese	99.7 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 51.4%
South Africans	99.7 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 51.4%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.7 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 51.4%
Zimbabweans	99.7 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 51.3%
Immigrants \| Europe	99.7 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 51.3%
Argentineans	99.6 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 51.2%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.5 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 51.0%
Egyptians	99.5 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 50.9%
Immigrants \| Argentina	99.5 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 50.9%