Immigrants from Japan vs Turkish Associate's Degree

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,131,347 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with at least associate's degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116 and weighted average of 54.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,852,708 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with at least associate's degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079 and weighted average of 53.9%, a difference of 1.3%.

Associate's Degree Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Japan	Turkish
Minimum	2.2%	21.5%
Maximum	91.6%	91.9%
Range	89.3%	70.3%
Mean	55.5%	51.4%
Median	60.0%	53.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	41.7%	44.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	68.5%	57.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	26.8%	12.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	20.1%	13.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	19.9%	13.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Turks by Associate's Degree

In terms of associate's degree, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Burmese (54.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sweden (54.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (54.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Cambodian (54.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Ireland (54.7%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from France (53.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Latvian (53.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (53.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (53.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Turkey (53.4%, a difference of 0.82%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Associate's Degree
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 55.4%
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 55.1%
Eastern Europeans	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 55.0%
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 54.8%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 54.7%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 54.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 54.6%
Immigrants \| Japan	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 54.6%
Burmese	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 54.6%
Immigrants \| Korea	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 54.5%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 54.5%
Immigrants \| Belgium	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 54.5%
Latvians	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 53.9%
Turks	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 53.9%
Immigrants \| France	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 53.9%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 53.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 53.5%
Immigrants \| Turkey	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 53.4%
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 53.4%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 53.3%
Russians	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 53.2%