Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Carpatho Rusyn Doctorate Degree

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,016,936 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with at least doctorate degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,704,885 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with at least doctorate degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.073 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 4.5%.

Doctorate Degree Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Czechoslovakia	Carpatho Rusyn
Minimum	0.28%	0.35%
Maximum	11.3%	6.5%
Range	11.0%	6.1%
Mean	3.2%	2.0%
Median	2.5%	1.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	1.8%	0.86%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	3.0%	2.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.2%	1.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.5%	1.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.5%	1.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Carpatho Rusyns by Doctorate Degree

In terms of doctorate degree, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Bolivian (2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Indonesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.4%, a difference of 0.44%), Ethiopian (2.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Lithuanian (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bolivia (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Canada (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Zimbabwean (2.3%, a difference of 0.48%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Doctorate Degree
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 2.4%
Immigrants \| Latvia	100.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 2.4%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	100.0 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 2.4%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 2.4%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	100.0 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 2.4%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	100.0 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 2.4%
Ethiopians	99.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 2.3%
South Africans	99.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 2.3%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.9 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 2.3%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 2.3%
Immigrants \| Europe	99.9 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 2.3%
Laotians	99.9 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 2.3%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 2.3%
Paraguayans	99.9 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 2.3%
Argentineans	99.9 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 2.3%
Zimbabweans	99.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 2.3%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	99.8 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 2.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	99.8 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 2.3%
Lithuanians	99.8 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 2.3%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.8 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 2.3%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.8 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 2.3%