Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guamanian/Chamorro Professional Degree

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,754,004 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and percentage of population with at least professional degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.166 and weighted average of 4.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,637,971 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and percentage of population with at least professional degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077 and weighted average of 3.8%, a difference of 5.3%.

Professional Degree Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Guamanian/Chamorro
Minimum	0.80%	1.0%
Maximum	5.3%	8.9%
Range	4.5%	7.8%
Mean	3.0%	3.3%
Median	3.1%	2.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.2%	2.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	3.8%	4.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.6%	2.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	1.2%	2.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	1.2%	1.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guamanians/Chamorros by Professional Degree

In terms of professional degree, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (4.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Tlingit-Haida (4.0%, a difference of 0.27%), German Russian (4.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Cuban (4.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and Immigrants from West Indies (4.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Alaskan Athabascan (3.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Native Hawaiian (3.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ecuador (3.8%, a difference of 0.10%), British West Indian (3.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Colville (3.8%, a difference of 0.72%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Professional Degree
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	7.4 /100 \| #223	Tragic 4.0%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	7.1 /100 \| #224	Tragic 4.0%
Tlingit-Haida	6.9 /100 \| #225	Tragic 4.0%
German Russians	6.1 /100 \| #226	Tragic 4.0%
Cubans	5.9 /100 \| #227	Tragic 4.0%
Immigrants \| West Indies	5.6 /100 \| #228	Tragic 4.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	5.4 /100 \| #229	Tragic 3.9%
Nicaraguans	5.1 /100 \| #230	Tragic 3.9%
Ecuadorians	4.6 /100 \| #231	Tragic 3.9%
Cree	4.3 /100 \| #232	Tragic 3.9%
Immigrants \| Philippines	4.1 /100 \| #233	Tragic 3.9%
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	4.0 /100 \| #234	Tragic 3.9%
Immigrants \| Barbados	4.0 /100 \| #235	Tragic 3.9%
Spanish Americans	3.8 /100 \| #236	Tragic 3.9%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	3.8 /100 \| #237	Tragic 3.9%
Colville	2.6 /100 \| #238	Tragic 3.8%
British West Indians	2.4 /100 \| #239	Tragic 3.8%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	2.3 /100 \| #240	Tragic 3.8%
Alaskan Athabascans	2.3 /100 \| #241	Tragic 3.8%
Native Hawaiians	2.3 /100 \| #242	Tragic 3.8%
Guamanians/Chamorros	2.2 /100 \| #243	Tragic 3.8%