Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Female Disability
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Yup'ik
Immigrants from Northern Africa
11.6%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,957,133 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.100 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,175,054 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.214 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.97%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yup'ik | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 4.3% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 25.0% | 25.6% |
Range | 20.7% | 22.1% |
Mean | 12.7% | 11.8% |
Median | 12.3% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Immigrants from Denmark (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Poland (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Serbia (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Colombian (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Chile (11.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ireland (11.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Chilean (11.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (11.5%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Colombians | 99.8 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Chileans | 99.8 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.8 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 99.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Yup'ik | 99.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.6% |