Vietnamese vs Carpatho Rusyn Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Vietnamese
Carpatho Rusyn
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Vietnamese
Carpatho Rusyns
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
47.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
35.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
187th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Vietnamese vs Carpatho Rusyn Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,721,676 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,871,605 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.65%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Vietnamese | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.63% |
Maximum | 10.1% | 19.6% |
Range | 9.0% | 19.0% |
Mean | 5.8% | 7.2% |
Median | 5.6% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 8.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Vietnamese and Carpatho Rusyns by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from England (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Canada (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are European (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), British (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |