Thai vs Burmese Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Thai
Burmese
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Thais
Burmese
8.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Burmese Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,261,452 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.557 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,803,120 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 7.4%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Thai | Burmese |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 14.7% | 37.5% |
Range | 12.9% | 36.5% |
Mean | 6.4% | 7.9% |
Median | 6.1% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 8.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Thais and Burmese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Israel (8.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Iran (8.5%, a difference of 1.0%), Iranian (8.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from China (8.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (8.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Soviet Union (9.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Venezuela (9.3%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Argentina (9.3%, a difference of 1.2%), Okinawan (9.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and Immigrants from Korea (9.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Soviet Union | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.4% |