Swiss vs Italian Male Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
Italian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Swiss
Italians
12.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
MALE DISABILITY
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Italian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,975,169 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,737,677 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Italian |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 57.9% | 68.8% |
| Range | 55.9% | 65.8% |
| Mean | 14.3% | 13.7% |
| Median | 12.4% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Italians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are European (12.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Chinese (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), British (12.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (12.0%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Yugoslavian (11.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Bahamian (11.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Northern European (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Samoan (11.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Italians | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Czechs | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 1.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.0 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 1.0 /100 | #245 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Danes | 0.9 /100 | #246 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Hungarians | 0.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Poles | 0.7 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.0% |
| German Russians | 0.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 0.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.5 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.0% |
| British | 0.4 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Chinese | 0.4 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Swiss | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Europeans | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |