Swiss vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Swiss
Immigrants from Hong Kong
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,154,677 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,791,593 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.92%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 0.66% | 0.25% |
| Maximum | 9.1% | 4.4% |
| Range | 8.4% | 4.2% |
| Mean | 2.7% | 2.4% |
| Median | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.75% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 0.79% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 0.78% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Immigrants from Chile (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Poland (2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Israel (2.4%, a difference of 0.17%), European (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Scotland (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from North Macedonia (2.4%, a difference of 0.0%), South American (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Northern European (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Scandinavian (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (2.4%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Croatians | 95.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Alsatians | 94.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Bhutanese | 94.5 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| British | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Greeks | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Slovenes | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 93.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Serbians | 93.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Scandinavians | 93.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| South Americans | 93.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 92.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.4% |