Sudanese vs Lithuanian Female Disability
COMPARE
Sudanese
Lithuanian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Sudanese
Lithuanians
12.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
59.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Lithuanian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,131,007 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,926,295 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.91%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sudanese | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 25.6% | 49.2% |
Range | 23.9% | 47.3% |
Mean | 12.4% | 16.8% |
Median | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 19.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Lithuanians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Scotland (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Icelander (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Syrian (12.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Moldova (12.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Ghanaian (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Latin America (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Haiti (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Lebanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Oceania (12.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Czech (12.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |
Syrians | 76.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Ghanaians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.1% |
Moroccans | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.1% |
Danes | 72.5 /100 | #157 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |
Guyanese | 64.7 /100 | #161 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 64.3 /100 | #162 | Good 12.1% |
Guatemalans | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 12.1% |
Czechs | 63.6 /100 | #164 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 61.8 /100 | #165 | Good 12.1% |
Lithuanians | 59.5 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 59.0 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 58.8 /100 | #168 | Average 12.2% |
Lebanese | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 12.2% |