Subsaharan African vs Ute Male Disability
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Ute
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Ute
11.8%
MALE DISABILITY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
MALE DISABILITY
9.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Ute Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,010,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,753 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.487 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Ute |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 38.5% | 31.7% |
| Range | 34.8% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 13.8% | 13.3% |
| Median | 11.7% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Ute by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Liberian (11.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Japanese (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bahamas (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Austrian (11.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Alsatian (11.7%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Spanish American Indian (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Icelander (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Thailand (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Mexican American Indian (11.6%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Icelanders | 10.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.6% |
| Spanish American Indians | 10.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.6% |
| Ute | 9.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 8.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 8.2 /100 | #212 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 7.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Lithuanians | 6.6 /100 | #214 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Indonesians | 5.9 /100 | #215 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 4.9 /100 | #216 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 4.6 /100 | #217 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 4.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Panamanians | 3.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 3.8 /100 | #220 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Alsatians | 3.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 3.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Japanese | 3.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Liberians | 3.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Austrians | 2.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 11.8% |