Subsaharan African vs Creek Female Disability
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Creek
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Creek
12.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Creek Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,044,435 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,448,690 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 23.1%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Creek |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 53.3% | 42.6% |
| Range | 48.8% | 34.2% |
| Mean | 15.1% | 20.5% |
| Median | 12.9% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 23.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Armenia (12.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Aleut (12.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Liberian (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Czechoslovakian (12.7%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Jamaicans | 1.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Hawaiians | 1.4 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 1.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.7% |
| British West Indians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Liberians | 1.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Aleuts | 1.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 1.0 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.0 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Bermudans | 1.0 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.9 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Spaniards | 0.7 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.6 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.8% |
| West Indians | 0.5 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Finns | 0.4 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Senegalese | 0.4 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 0.68%), Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.6%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and Colville (15.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |