Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Vietnam Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Vietnam
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Vietnam
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Vietnam Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,662,958 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.35%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Immigrants from Vietnam |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.23% |
Maximum | 6.1% | 29.8% |
Range | 5.1% | 29.6% |
Mean | 3.2% | 3.7% |
Median | 3.0% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 3.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 0.53% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Immigrants from Vietnam by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Vietnam are Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |