South American Indian vs South African Female Disability
COMPARE
South American Indian
South African
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
South American Indians
South Africans
11.8%
FEMALE DISABILITY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
FEMALE DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs South African Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,561,575 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.149 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,588,649 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.895 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 0.62%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | South African |
Minimum | 4.7% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 30.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 25.9% | 94.7% |
Mean | 13.2% | 15.3% |
Median | 11.8% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 17.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 17.6% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and South Africans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Latvia (11.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Macedonian (11.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Europe (11.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Nicaraguan (11.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Italy (11.8%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Brazilian (11.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (11.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Morocco (11.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Costa Rican (11.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Soviet Union | 98.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Costa Ricans | 98.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 97.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.8% |
South Africans | 97.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Brazilians | 97.7 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.6 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 97.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 97.2 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 97.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 96.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 96.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Italy | 96.4 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Europe | 96.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.8% |
South American Indians | 95.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 95.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 95.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Nicaraguans | 95.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 11.9% |