South American Indian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
South American Indian
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
South American Indians
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
10.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,539,388 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,791,750 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 2.4%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 33.4% | 29.9% |
Range | 31.7% | 27.6% |
Mean | 13.4% | 11.7% |
Median | 11.1% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.3% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Lithuanian (10.8%, a difference of 0.92%), Sierra Leonean (10.8%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and Australian (10.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.6%, a difference of 0.040%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Ecuadorian (10.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Syria (10.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (10.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 94.1 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 10.6% |
South Africans | 93.3 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 93.1 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Syria | 93.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 92.8 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Albania | 92.5 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 92.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 92.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 92.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Salvadorans | 91.9 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 91.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |