Slovene vs Chinese Male Disability
COMPARE
Slovene
Chinese
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Slovenes
Chinese
12.0%
MALE DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovene vs Chinese Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,347,999 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,721 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.20%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slovene | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 39.4% | 31.9% |
| Range | 37.8% | 30.7% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 13.4% |
| Median | 13.1% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Slovenes and Chinese by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Guamanian/Chamorro (12.0%, a difference of 0.0%), German Russian (12.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Bangladeshi (12.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Yemen (12.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and British (12.1%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are British (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Swiss (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), European (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and German Russian (12.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.0 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 1.0 /100 | #245 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Danes | 0.9 /100 | #246 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Hungarians | 0.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Poles | 0.7 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.0% |
| German Russians | 0.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 0.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.5 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.0% |
| British | 0.4 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Chinese | 0.4 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Swiss | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Europeans | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Basques | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Belgians | 0.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Swedes | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Slavs | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Canadians | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |